|
Info
| Bike I ride: | ns bikes majesty, 09 reba team 20mm. nice and light. always kept dialed. |
| Products Recommended: | none - View Products |
| Companies Supported: | none - View Companies |
creamsoda's Activity
creamsoda commented under creamsoda's photo
(
2 hours ago )
creamsoda commented under kornykona's photo
(
3 hours ago )
posted in
"A dedicated (and weird) thread to show off your pedals!"
(
4 hours ago )
posted in
"Post your NS bikes!"
(
14 hours ago )
creamsoda wrote on connorboycott's noteboard
(
1 days ago )
thanks for the help! Friends
-
-
bikerboyolly
Ellesmere Port
Male , 15
-
-
lilshredder
delete
Male , 15
-
-
the-ultimate-cyclist
Port Hope
Male , 16
-
-
markbatt
Toronto
Male , 19
-
-
brodieinnes
Adelaide
Male , 15
-
-
antur
Siedlce
-
-
mdew
Petaluma
Male , 15
-
-
one25forlife
Abbotsford
Male , 15
NoteBoard
Rattsl
wrote
Nov 14, 2009 at 22:39
Nov 14, 2009 at 22:39
damn...I'll find out later..lost a washer for my hub and I can't ride this one for 2 weeks. 24lbs ans 8 oz though! I can actually go lighter. I only changed the front tire to a 2.2 xr1 Team Issue. I'm gonna do 2.0 xr1 Team issues and lighter tubes.
lafalot
wrote
Nov 12, 2009 at 17:32
Nov 12, 2009 at 17:32
Oh, and SB8 were at MEC last time i was there..um 3 weeks ago? I'm sure they have started stocking them, since when i was there, it wasn't just one or two..it was a whole stack. Call em up and make sure the person actually WALKS to the aisle to look and not just check the computer, because its still not on their website yet for some reason.
brandonf
wrote
Nov 12, 2009 at 17:14
Nov 12, 2009 at 17:14
they have noticeably more grip and just feel better in general. The 1.95 sb8s felt especially bad on concrete
brandonf
wrote
Nov 7, 2009 at 13:28
Nov 7, 2009 at 13:28
I like the race kings way better. I'm running a 2.2 front/2.0 rear combo and it's great. If you have the clearance in the rear, then I would recommend getting two 2.2's because they are 479g and the 2.0's are 423g. For such a small weight difference, I think its totally worth it to get two 2.2's because the 2.0 is tiny. Way narrower than a 1.95 small block
dkidd
wrote
Nov 6, 2009 at 14:54
Nov 6, 2009 at 14:54
Compared to 5.1D's- not as soft, but laterally not as strong. Much lighter though, I would say 719's are better.
521's- Much lighter, similar strength and stiffness. 521's suck.
721's- Not nearly as strong, but considerably lighter. I spin hard on 719s and they hold up OK, I just have to true them more often. As a keeper wheelset, I'd go 721's (strength over weight) but if you like light shit, or you never pivot/under-rotate 3's, 719's will do you fine. Keep your tension up!)
521's- Much lighter, similar strength and stiffness. 521's suck.
721's- Not nearly as strong, but considerably lighter. I spin hard on 719s and they hold up OK, I just have to true them more often. As a keeper wheelset, I'd go 721's (strength over weight) but if you like light shit, or you never pivot/under-rotate 3's, 719's will do you fine. Keep your tension up!)
Hummeroid
wrote
Nov 3, 2009 at 12:57
Nov 3, 2009 at 12:57
Small bump is spring pressure, Bottom out is reservoir pressure/volume relationship. Totally different. It can be done. It might not feel like a 6 inch trail bike but it can happen.
The commencal meta 4x would be another to look at
The commencal meta 4x would be another to look at
Hummeroid
wrote
Nov 3, 2009 at 11:47
Nov 3, 2009 at 11:47
Gonna kill someone in there.
Double is a great option, it can be setup for trail no problem
Double is a great option, it can be setup for trail no problem























RSS
2 days ago